I had a phone call this morning from a party member asking which way I intend to vote in the leadership elections.
Of course I know all the candidates well but I have never tried to persuade party members on which way they should vote. The Newport West Executive decided not to nominate. I have no quarrel with that. Members will make their own minds up.
My caller today asked why I have not declared support for Jeremy Corbyn. He is my closest friend among the candidates. I have spoken on more public platforms with him in recent years than any other MP. Tribune has forecast that I will be offered a star shadow cabinet role if Jeremy is elected! On all the key issues of war and environment in the Commons, we both always speak and vote on the same side.
Today’s Western Mail reports that Jeremy has just read the book Clear Red Water and enthusiastically supports its message. I wrote the introduction to the book and remain its greatest fan. (Below). So why am I not voting for him for leader? It’s because Labour is a national political party, not a pressure group. It’s futile being ideologically perfect but politically impotent. We can change the leader: we cannot change the electorate.
There were small parties in the General Election who campaigned on the green and radical policies that Jeremy and I espouse. Their support was minute. Some voters backed us both Jeremy and I for our left of centre views. Most voted for our Labour Party ticket. It's a myth that there is an untapped reservoir of radical votes.
I would love to believe that a Government with Jeremy’s policies could be elected in 2020. It would create a fairer, more rational and peaceful country. The achievements of the great 1945-51 Government could be repeated. If only. Between the dream and the reality falls the leaden curtain truth. Sadly, I fear that the Government of Attlee and Bevan would not be elected in 2020. I write as one of only a handful of MPs who worked in the 1945 election. I was a precocious ten-year-old political nerd but the excitement and pride in achievement are precious living memories.
The party must have a chance of changing its mind on this vote with a fresh election in two years time. If the victor is as popular as the party then she/he would be re-elected. Meanwhile we have the deadly serious job of exposing the policies of injustice, bad science, greed and environmental vandalism of the present Government. We can best do that by uniting and working under the new leader whoever she/he is.
Introduction to
CLEAR RED WATER
by Paul Flynn
2009
This book is a delight tempered with shame for me because my appreciation of the philosophy and pioneering work WAG was so deficient. How could I have missed so many of the achievements of of the Welsh Assembly Government?
This is a splendid time to top up my knowledge banks. We are on the brink of the Obama revolution. Political certainties are collapsing and the world economy is convulsed. Welsh Labour is receptive to fresh ideas that challenge the superficial canards of New Labour.
The Labour movement has been hurt by bewildering self-destructive polices from Westminster. On the gravest error the Iraq War, the Labour Party in Wales had their objections silenced by bureaucratic procedure. An explosion of anger from a lifelong Labour supporter Professor Peter Hennessy in January 2009 illustrates the depth of the wound. In answer to a question on why the Labour Cabinet did not insist on seeing the full advice on the legality of the war, Peter said: ' We need to know the degree to which they did or did not test out this little shrivelled opinion. Did anyone ask for a fuller one? Under the Ministerial code they are meant to have the full Attorney General's legal opinion but they did not get it, did they? I have a suspicion not one of them spoke up. An injection of water would have stiffened those bastards' backbones.'
This is the authentic exasperated anger at the wayward drift of New Labour from our core values. Our subservience to American’s Neo-cons was our foulest hour. Many opportunities have been neglected and much of the value of Labour's electoral victories were dissipated in fruitless meandering into political dead-ends. Happily, Labour in Wales has embarked on its voyage across the clear red water. Nick Davies and Darren Williams reveal the divergence between Classic Labour and New Labour. In Wales Labour has clung to the party’s traditional values avoiding much of New Labour’s perverse shift to the false gods of fashionable modernisation, (Hobson’s) choice, 'contestability' and the supremacy of the market. With commendable objectivity the authors have chronicled the chosen paths of Welsh Labour. The Welsh Assembly has sought an equality of outcome rather than an equality of opportunity. Consumerism is rejected in favour of a collective voice. Mark Drakeford the guru of Welsh Labour argues that ‘ Services that are reserved for poor people very quickly become poor services’ but universal services can be the ‘glue that binds together a complex modern society.’ Free school breakfasts are provided in Wales for all pupils not just for those stigmatised as needy.
Unfortunately Welsh Labour's passage across the red water encounters some treacherous rocks. The inbuilt conservatism of officials and the power retentive neurosis of Welsh MPs are formidable obstructions. The institutional inertia of the Civil Service mandarins has passed almost unchanged from Westminster to Cardiff. Davies and Williams write: 'The policy of delivery of profound change to the marginalised is entrusted to officials schooled in the arts of deliberate administrative adjustment, ensuring that that anything remotely radical or ambitious passes through a series of filters that serve, all too frequently to mitigate its impact.’ Some Labour MPs have perpetuated their traditional role as a drag anchor on devolution. In 1950 only 5 Welsh MPs backed the call for devolution. Some MPs campaigned to sabotage party policy in the two referendums. The recent alleged slow motion implementation of Legislative Competence Orders has reinforced the suspicion that MPs feel threatened by the movement of power down the M4 to Cardiff. Loss of Welsh Parliamentary seats is the likely outcome of the evolution of Welsh autonomy. Nothing concentrates the mind more than the prospect of an approaching P45. A small group of MPs remain in denial of devolution. Speaker Betty Boothroyd intervened in the fisrt year of WAG to block MPs questions on matters that had clearly been devolved to Cardiff. The shock of the election of non-Labour MPs in Llanelli, Islwyn and the Rhondda in 1999 still reverberates. A renewed bid for the hegemony of MPs over AMs was recently made on the basis that more votes are cast in General than in Assembly Elections. Why stop there? On that argument, MPs should also determine Council and European Parliamentary decisions. Welsh MPs’ attempts to obstruct the One Wales coalition agreement were emphatically rejected by the party in Wales. But fear that coalition would dilute Labour's radical policies were unfounded.
On health the coalition government has strengthened the commitment to ‘move purposefully to end the internal market.’ by merging the functions of trusts and Local Health Boards. Support for WAG policies has been unreliable and spasmodic in the greater party. Sniping from London ministers still undermines the independence of decision-making. There is permanent irritation at Westminster that a Labour controlled body can stray from the revealed truth of the fashionable, often short-lived, nostrums of New Labour. It was a courageous Welsh decision to reject PFIs and the instant political gratification they offered. WAG policies will deliver better value and a fully publicly owned NHS in the long term.This is in the tradition of the founding father Aneurin Bevan. Prolonging the existence of Community Health Councils has been a popular success that reflects the respect for patient involvement.
I recall the pride of Ron Davies when he added the word 'sustainable' to the Wales Act. We are one of only three nations in the world to have a duty of sustainable development enshrined in our constitution. The Assembly has redefined sustainability as: ‘Improving people’s quality of life and well-being, while using environmental resources sustainably, so that development does not compromise the quality of life of future generations.’ To their great credit the Welsh Assembly Government has earned universal praise for its imaginative pursuit of practical sustainable policies that are ‘the single organising principle for all parts of the public sector.’ The hope is that our global footprint could be reduced to that of a ‘one planet nation’.
The leadership of First Minister Rhodri Morgan has been the inspiration for the loyalty to 'Classic Labour'. In two major speeches he has differentiated Welsh Labour from New Labour. Rhodri’s recipe for Wales is more ‘participative than passive’ and the role of the state as a force for good in politics. It’s refreshing that the Welsh Government has the stated aim of Welsh socialism for the 21st century. This is founded on Welsh working class idealism exemplified by Chartism and the immense achievements of the 1945-51 Labour Government. The present political turmoil has undermined the laissez-faire nostrums of Thatcherism and Blairism. Light touch state intervention has allowed the market to gorge, exploit and pillage. The future is malleable and it will be receptive to a freshened socialist creed.
Nick Davies and Darren Williams have produced a fair-minded thorough account of the ambitions, achievements and failures of the limited Welsh home-rule that we enjoy. Even those who are in daily contact with the microsurgery of nation building will learn a great deal from thier account of the struggle for a distinctive Welsh Way to challenge the Third way. Rightly, they complain of the widespread lack of understanding and promotion of the achievements of WAG. News from WAG is dominated by media-encouraged ephemeral crises and rows. The daily trivia obscures the big picture that is brilliantly presented here. Welsh Labour has demonstrated that a practical alternative exists to the policies pursued by New Labour in England. Welsh Labour Grassroots has developed as the thinking conscience of the labour movement in Wales. It will greatly influence the direction of Welsh politics in the advance towards a brave new Wales.
I share almost all these views. As I say I am very close to Jeremys views and distant from lots of those Liz. Getting a bit irritated by those who have joined and intend to leave after the election. You should vote.
Paul Flynn MP
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 15, 2015 at 06:43 PM
Thanks Paul for this piece. I cannot make up my mind about who to vote for. I agree with Jeremy Corbyn about Trident, austerity, about the need to extend public ownership and many other things. I am glad that the case against austerity has been made and seems central to this leadership campaign. I think the party machine has been shaken and hope that it will change as a result. I have never abstained in an election as a matter of choice but just cannot decide who to vote for. My big reservation about Liz Kendall is her apparent belief that reducing the deficit and achieving 2% of GDP for defence spending were the most important priorities at the start of the campaign. I cannot subscribe to that any more than I know you would. I am usually able to come a conclusion, often no doubt wrong, but here I am in that group of don't knows!!
Posted by: Alun Williams | August 15, 2015 at 05:18 PM
Thanks Mike for your kind comments. I understand every word you write. If the party does get a 'jolt', I will be there in support making the best of whoever the new Leader will be. I regret the extravagant threats being made by comrades in this build-up. The wounds inflicted will not heal easily. Sorry that your health is not good. Look after yourself.
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM
Your arguments are very sound but I will still be voting for Jeremy and Angela. My view is that when, all those years ago we sat in Llew's office and put the world to rights, we little thought that we would be presented with the choice we now have. Which is four candidates who will never be PM and only one of whom will change anything. Both of us know the PLP is overstacked with The Barsteward Sons of Blair, that was his legacy, but I believe they need a jolt and a reminder that the party belongs to the members not them. Hope you are keeping reasonably well. I'm not. Still think of you with huge respect and affection. Best wishes.
Posted by: Mike Phillips | August 14, 2015 at 12:33 PM
Assuming the polls are right and JC wins, do you think and hope that the PLP will support him? Comments from the likes of Simon Danczuk are highly destabilising and totally undemocratic, would you agree?
Posted by: stuart mcc | August 14, 2015 at 12:21 PM
Thanks Peter for your interest in my introduction to Clear Red Waters. If was written seven years ago but having forgotten most of it, I believe its a friendly, but true, account of the work of devolution in Wales.
Cheers. Paul Flynn MP
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 14, 2015 at 11:03 AM
Thanks Ad.
Party membership shot up immediately after the General Election. As you can imagine I take a great interest in the new members. I am not worried about Tory entryists. There may be one or two that I have missed but of the 200 new members, theres no more than that. I am not unhappy about the few green/far left people who have come in. They enrich the party and add new energy and idealism. We must convinced them that the Labour Party is their home habitat and a permanent roost for them. The great majority of new members are Labour voters who never managed to make the effort to join. Last night we had a great night with some marvellous new people. They are all warmly welcome to the Labour Party family..
Paul Flynn MP
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 14, 2015 at 10:55 AM
Id love to be proved wrong. In Green and left policies were on offer by smaller. The electorate did not jump at them.
Paul Flynn MP
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 14, 2015 at 09:39 AM
I think you may underestimate the mood of the country and it's ability to change in response to a more positive vision.
Posted by: Mike Parker | August 14, 2015 at 09:07 AM
Hi Chris its AV so you can chose 3 non JC candidates and if they get eliminated it goes to JC versus A N Other. All votes count!
Posted by: Patrick Lilley | August 14, 2015 at 04:56 AM
I'd rather see a real somewhat social democrat led opposition than a Tory clone in government. Whats the point in that? And I've no more time for the Tories than any of the other commenters.
Build steadily from a base of principle and I'm sure the time will come when the Tories are kicked out. Party membership has shot up off the back of Corbyn offering an alternative. I think you could be underestimating the potential there.
Posted by: Ad | August 13, 2015 at 09:31 PM
What policies have the others got that are more appealing to the electorate ? who other than JC will win back Scotland ? If you had not noticed we THE GRASS ROOTS ARE SICK TO THE HIGH TEETH WITH PERSONALITIES - we want MPs to talk about policies so forget you are a mate of JC and tell us what you like about the others policies please x
Posted by: Paul | August 13, 2015 at 06:37 PM
Paul you are right Rhodri's leadership did mean that his government acted as a force for good. Rightly or wrongly I fear voters don't feel that now of the present Assembly. Presentation is the problem not the policies. We are wandering zombie like towards the election.
Posted by: Peter Curtis | August 13, 2015 at 06:12 PM
By the way Sally, I saw one tabloid attack on JC because he had signed one of Tony's EDMs. It was one of the few of his that I refused to sign. He called for an asteroid to hit the earth and wipe out all of humanity because of the way we treated pigeons in war. Calling for the annihilation of all my constituents a few months before the 2005 election would not have been wise.
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 13, 2015 at 06:11 PM
Absolutely. We are giving hostages to fortune and building up trouble ahead. I will certainly suport the new leader 100%/
Good of you to write.
Paul Flynn MP
01633 262 348/ 0788 792 5699
Twitter: @paulflynnmp
www.paulflynnmp.co.uk
blog paulflynnmp.co.uk
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 13, 2015 at 06:02 PM
Totally agree Paul. JC would not be a credible leader . We need to be in Government to make changes .
Am concerned what some of the PLP are saying.. We all need to work together whoever is leader.
Posted by: Sally Banks | August 13, 2015 at 05:45 PM
Thanks Chris. I ma committed to Liz Kendall because she is the only one that is clearly committed to hold a seconds election if she a flop in two years.
Best wishes,
Paul Flynn MP
Posted by: Paul Flynn | August 13, 2015 at 05:31 PM
Well said Paul, although I don't agree with your choice for leader you speak the truth on making the Labour Party more than a mere pressure group of the left.
If we act as an echo chamber for our own political self-satisfaction, which only serves to make us feel happy with ourselves then the electorate will treat us as such.
Although I would ask who you would recommend supporters unite behind now it's clear Liz Kendall is not going to make it to the final round and Corbyn is not a viable option?
Posted by: Chris Carter | August 13, 2015 at 05:22 PM