The World Health Organisation (WHO) were exposed to criticism and cross-examination today. This is grand self-admiring body that is reluctant to make itself accountable to the public and press. Answers were sought to the question, 'Did the WHO cry wolf and frighten the world unnecessarily?'
The Council of Europe represents 800 million people in 47 countries. While we MPs can question the conduct of our own domestic governments. only an international body like the COE can tackle the WHO.
This morning, a Council of Europe Committee held its first session on the swine flu pandemic 'that never was.' There was huge interest from the press who excelled in their sharp questioning in a subsequent press conference. I was very happy to be appointed the rapporteur for this subject. It will be my job to write the report that will eventually be presented to the full Council of Europe for approval.
I told Dr Keiji Fukuda, Special Adviser on Pandemic Influenza to the Director-General,
(WHO) that his contribution was disappointing. Not a word of regret or apology. After all, they had frightened the world with the threat of deaths on a massive scale. Subsequent events prove that this fear-mongering was unjustified. The other consequences were £billions spent on unneeded vaccines and a disruption of health services worldwide.
Dr Luc Hessel, represented the European Vaccine Manufacturers who have made several fortunes out of selling Swine Flu Vaccines. He confirmed that the Pharmas invested $4 Billion in preparations for the Swine Flu Pandemic beforehand. They had a vested interest in exaggerating the seriousness of the illness. That investment would have been in vain if the world had not been galvanised with fear.
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, medical expert specialising in epidemiology and former Chair
of the Sub-committee on Health of the COE called for this inquiry. He made a powerful case on the potential problems of vaccines that had not been sufficiently tested. He charge that the composition of the medicines was determined by the need to make money from patents rather than the well-being of patients
Professor Emeritus Dr. Ulrich Keil, University Professor and Director of the WHO
Collaborating Centre for Epidemiology of the University of Münster fully supported the case presented by Doctor Wodarg.
The UK Government came out of the hearing with some credit. We were one of the few countries that urged the WHO to water down their terrifying warnings of a health holocaust. Health secretary of State Alan Johnstone made a plea to moderate the message to avoid public hysteria.
I promised that I will act as rapporteur and report on the scientific principles in examining evidence objectively. I look forward to the work. the WHO has served the world well in the past by eliminating smallpox and reducing the effects of other major diseases. I hope they learn a little humility and express some contrition. Otherwise trust is this vital force in world health will crumble.
(Thanks to David Tarlo for the pictures)
Popish plot?
One delicious rumour that is circulating in Strasbourg is that the Pope has intervened in the election of Committee chairpeople here. Up for grabs was the chair of the powerful Politics Committee. One of Berlesconi's acolytes was up for the job. It is claimed the Papal Nuncio conveyed the Pope's view that the Italian should get the job. He did.
A few months ago the candidates campaigned for superior morals throughout Europe. He could make a start with own leader.
Correction, children do not get more aluminium in one feed don't know what I was thinking.
They get more aluminium from feeding in the first 6 months of their life than they do from vaccinations
4.4 milligrams from vaccination
7 milligrams for breast fed children
formula fed 38 milligrams
and soy formula fed about 117 milligrams.
Thank goodness for holfordwatch for those figures.
Posted by: HuwOS | January 31, 2010 at 10:38 PM
And what exactly are the dangers of squalene or ethyl mercury or aluminium in vaccines.
Squalene is present in all animals and plants,
in humans our liver produces it, its in our bloodstream and can be detected in our oily fingerprints.
Thiomersal is being phased out as a purely precautionary measure particularly in vaccinations for children and it seems primarily to quiet the hysterics, but the only concern if it can be called a concern that there was about it was that infants who would be receiving multiple vaccinations might therefore get too great a quantity of ethyl mercury over too short a period of time. That it is now only in the flu vaccine means there is no risk of that happening.
As for aluminium, children get more aluminium from breast feeding or from infant formula in one feed than they would get from a vaccination.
Posted by: HuwOS | January 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM
The future of Wales lies with our children and that includes those still in utero.
How can it possibly be considered wise or ethical to unleash this untested vaccine on the children of Wales?
The swine flu leaflet produced by WAG is woefully lacking in warnings regarding the components of this vaccine.Do your own research before accepting this vaccine.Check out the adverse effects of mercury,squalene and aluminium for starters !
Posted by: Meryl Davies,Patient for Patient Safety Champion. | January 31, 2010 at 10:07 PM
"There is much evidence to attest to an agenda of mass depopulation and sterilization through the use of these bioweaponized vaccines."
How can there be evidence of the vaccine's effects if they were never properly tested in the first place? If you can't prove they work, you can't prove they harm.
Simples!
Posted by: DG | January 27, 2010 at 09:39 AM
Woo hoo. 0.1% growth .. impressive eh?
I suppose its a start but the economy has declined by 6% in the recession so we have a way to go ..
..and if the figures for growth turn down on March 26th then I think that's all she wrote ..
Its an interesting dilemma really
a) we've returned to growth , we're great - vote Labour
b) growth is still fragile , trust us more than the Tories - vote Labour
Hmmm, alternatively who managed us through the worst recession of any G8 country and whose budget deficit is now in double figures ?
I'll have to think about that one ..
Posted by: Tony | January 27, 2010 at 09:04 AM
That's a new conspiracy theory. Is it mutation of the water fluoridation one?
Posted by: Kay Tie | January 27, 2010 at 01:05 AM
Dear Mr. Flynn,
One major point that your network seems to be ignoring is the efficacy and lethality of the vaccines. There is much evidence to attest to an agenda of mass depopulation and sterilization through the use of these bioweaponized vaccines. The evidence has been presented in the United States and in the Ukraine to legal authorities.
You should really be looking into this, as you have allowed millions of your own countrymen to be contaminated with them. It's the least that you could do for all that you and your's have allowed to be done.
Posted by: Liz Book | January 26, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Paul Flynn MP House of Commons London SW1A OAA
Dip into now daily blog on paulflynnmp.co.uk.
Posted by: Paul Flynn | January 26, 2010 at 10:40 PM
"Patrick, I think an off shore account is a little over the top. Perhaps an old exercise book would be better to keep track of the hidden funds."
Paul, that's too subtle for Patrick. He doesn't think there's anything wrong with the Leader of the People's Tribunes skimming money from the Party: a case of "L'etat, c'est moi"
Posted by: Kay Tie | January 26, 2010 at 10:32 PM
"It's incredible that we have such a stupid system of paying taxes into government hands to then be spent on services."
In your little red book, all government spending = services. I asked you to explain how the bin police can be regarded as a service, and you haven't. Perhaps you are one of the clipboard-wielding wastrels, in which case I can perfectly well understand the self-interest of your class.
I asked you whether you were interested in education policies that would radically improve education. You weren't interested (did you know we spend £6000 per pupil per year on schools, yet only a third of that gets through to the schools themselves?).
You're just not interested in these things. For you, the rich people (you would call them kulaks in another country and another time) should be punished and their wealth confiscated and spent on services. Only for you, "services" would include cars for important Party workers and private lanes for those cars.
You've got nothing positive to offer people. All you want to do is confiscate and destroy, with these base urges of yours masquerading as "helping people". You learned nothing from the past and would dearly love to put failed ideas into practice today.
Posted by: Kay Tie | January 26, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Patrick, I think an off shore account is a little over the top. Perhaps an old exercise book would be better to keep track of the hidden funds.
Posted by: Paul | January 26, 2010 at 09:58 PM
That's right KT, all the cash should be in off shore accounts clearly labelled EVASION.
It's incredible that we have such a stupid system of paying taxes into government hands to then be spent on services.
Isn't it appalling that we have Transport,Education, NHS, Fire, Police , and Army services etc.
Rich people's money would be far better spent on highly skilled accountancy and themselves.
Posted by: Patrick | January 26, 2010 at 09:35 PM
"But we do need some heads to roll. Corporate Corruption must be curbed. Too many governments were sold too many ruinous white elephants!'
Perhaps it's time to recognise that governments shouldn't have the power or money to buy white elephants in the first place.
Posted by: Kay Tie | January 26, 2010 at 08:59 PM
I'm so pleased that you are helping to draw attention to the Swine Flu Vaccine Scandal and WHO's large part in it.
But we do need some heads to roll. Corporate Corruption must be curbed. Too many governments were sold too many ruinous white elephants!
Posted by: Margaret Wilde | January 26, 2010 at 08:56 PM