« Boris' Bike flop? | Main | Exit date welcome »

December 01, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

insurance tacoma

business insurance seattle

Its intersting to see how much conflict exist over this film!

Paul Flynn

That's a fair point Kay Tie. ut there is a big difference. Lord Lang's firm was sued by Eliot Spitzer for the public good. I was threatened with huge costs by a firm that wanted to shut me up. I was acting in the interests of people who were paying 25% of their compensation to a firm of ambulance chasers.

Kay Tie

"While you are secure in your belief that you are entirely innocent, do you not think that people outside might consider that there was a cloud over your background which would disqualify you from this appointment? "

Is this a question to Lord Monkton over settling out of court rather than face a distracting lawsuit, or to Paul Flynn for settling out of court rather than face a distracting libel lawsuit? Hard to tell.

Come on Paul, you of all people should know that caving in to legal threats is not prima facie evidence of wrongdoing.

The comments to this entry are closed.