« No Bienvenue for Prescott | Main | From coalition to consummation? »

June 29, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

LillyD

Hey,

Only joined here now.

Looking forward to greet you all!

Cheers!

Get an EFTPOS Machine!

Anon

Dear Uncle Paul,

Your Hutton scale is interesting but not scientific. A physicist might define some kind of logarithmic scale, (like the pH or Richter scales) based for example the ratio of truth to bullshit. We perhaps should use a base of two. So, let's name the scale after dear old Neil Kinnock, who would traditionally dispense twice as much truth as bullshit. A ratio of 2-1 would be 2 to the power 1 or 1 Kinnock. People like yourself or Bob Marshall-Andrews who have a T-B ratio of at least 8-1 would register 3+ (8=2 to the power 3) on the Kinnock scale, whereas Peter Hain , who dispenses truth and bullshit in equal measure, would score Zero (1-1 = 1 = 2 to the power 0) on the Kinnock scale. (Lets's face it - for all his skills, Peter is no Kinnock!) Alan Johnson would have a score of -3, meaning that the truth to bullshit ratio would be 1-8, whereas Tony's score would tend to minus infinity.

Of course, we could set up the scale slightly differently - if we used a scale like the bel-decibel scale for sound which has a base of ten, then one Cook would be 2 Kinnocks, or 20 deciKinnocks - but this might be more difficult to understand.

I hope this gives you pause to think and to smile,

Keep up the good work - if I had an MP like you I might still be in the Labour Party.

The comments to this entry are closed.