« Voyage into a world beyond sight. Notes on Blindness | Main | State visit nightmare of a protozoan President »

February 18, 2017

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

rwendland

It would be silly to go ahead with site preparation as it it uncertain any new owner of NuGen (the Moorside company) would want to build the AP1000 design, as opposed to some other. Toshiba have said they want to sell their share of NuGen.

There have been press reports of discussions with South Korean KEPCO. Almost certainly they would want to build the Korean APR-1400 design.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/09/12/south-koreas-kepco-in-talks-to-join-cumbrian-10bn-nuclear-projec/

In fact Moorside is a poor choice for a nuclear site. There is the enormous £2 billion cost of providing a high capacity link to the National Grid to fund. Also because of its northerly position, there is about a 5% increased electricity transmission loss compared to southerly sites like Sizewell and Hinkley, as the overall grid flow is to the south where the highest consumption is.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)