« Don't they know there's a bloody war on? | Main | Why continue lethal patrols? »

October 22, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


"We must rely rely on blind faith that Charles' birth justifies his succession without any quibble"

That is a fact Paul, his birth does "justify" his succession, that's how hereditary monarchy works, so we are using a particularly "given" value for "justify" here.
Surely as long as he actually remains powerless then expressing his opinions can't do any great harm unless people start making the intended to be private communications public.

Perhaps concentrating instead on ensuring that the laws are fixed to ensure that the royals have no special privileges (no more consent to legislation) with government would be a better use of time, nobody seems particularly keen on having an elected non executive head of state.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)