James Purnell has spoken for many in the Parliamentary Labour Party.
There is great affection and loyalty to Gordon Brown. He has been cruelly and often unfairly maligned. He has great strengths and some fatal weaknesses. The expenses scandal is a parliamentary crisis. But the public largely blame Labour. Some of the worst offenders have been Labour MPs but many Conservative offences have been shameless and colourful. But the spirited interventions of David Cameron and Nick Clegg have deflected blame from their parties. Gordon Brown has been heavy footed, inconsistent and defensive.
There is now a wide coalition of MPs from all wings of the Labour Party who are sadly convinced that a change of leadership in now unavoidable. It is hoped that Gordon will accept the will of the PLP and agree to a swift orderly exit.
The Labour Party has always been reluctant to drop leaders. The Tories brutally dumped Thatcher. But Labour clung on to Michael Foot in 1983 even though Dennis Healey would have been an electoral asset to us. For the sake of the millions who benefit from the work of the Labour Party in Government we must select a new national leader.
Rush to rant
It's enough to restore my faith in ranting.
Last night at a reception following the WEU meeting at the Palais D'Iena, I was aware of a group of young people edging their way towards me. They were strangers but we were soon in an animated conversation.
The secret in making good speeches is not to change the speech but to change the audience. The WEU Assembly had not previously heard my impassioned views on Afghanistan. The anger shows.
Originally I bastardised the Charge of the Light Brigade poem in March 2006. I was using hyperbole to warn that stirring up the hornet's nest of Helmand was a blunder equivalent to the most unforgettable calamity of the Crimean war. Now, we know, it's worse. 118 British soldiers died in the charge of the Light Brigade. Since March 2006 an additional 159 British soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan.
Again our soldier lions are being led over the abyss by ministerial and military donkeys. It's impossible to speak of these tragedies without emotion. The group of young people who approached me last night are all working for the Western European Union. They are very bright interns who write the high quality WEU reports. Politicians are the named 'rapporteurs' who receive the plaudits. In some cases they contribute little except to add their signature when the writing is completed.
Last night's group of five interns originated from three countries. All were enthusiastic for a fresh approach to the present war of futility in Afghanistan. They challenged the orthodox views on a war without end or purpose. Kindly they said that only LibDem Mike Hancock and I contributed fresh thinking to a debate clogged with ossified thinking and group delusions.
Thank you very much Juliet and friends. I promise more ranting
MPs expenses-next steps
The following advert will appear in tomorrow's South Wales Argus.
Thanks to all those who contributed to the public meeting I called last week to discuss MPs expenses. Your suggestions will be used in my submission to Sir Christopher Kelly's Committee. Further ideas are invited.
Means Test: There has been outrage because many millionaire MPs have been milking parliamentary allowances for items unconnected with parliamentary duties. Payments in future should match individual MPs' needs or be incorporated at a reduced rate into salaries.
Lobbying must be cleaned up. Present arrangements allow influence to be bought. It is potentially corrupting - or worse. I am pressing for mandatory disclosures and transparency.
Double Jobbing: An MP's job is a fulltime one. Those who take outside jobs should have their moonlighting hours declared and their parliamentary pay reduced. Former ministers and top civil servants should be barred from taking jobs in the areas in which they served.
Pensions: MPs pensions are based on final salaries. Many other occupational pensions are declining in value. MPs should not have a pensions more favourable than everyone else.
MPs pay should be linked to the level of the state basic pension.
Heatmap (above) show levels of claims. the lighter the colour the more modest the claim. Newport West is the yellow one above the B in Bristol. Details of my past and current claims are available on www.paulflynnmp.co.uk
First cock-up
The LibDems are in front with the first Speakership campaign embarrassing error.
An engaging letter from LibDems aspirant Speaker Alan Beith arrived claiming that his manifesto was attached. Opening the attachment revealed a complete lists of members of parliament's select committee. Huh?
Within a hour the grovelling apology and the correct attachment arrived. The LibDems have not quite got the hang of this hi-tech stuff. The apology said how easy it is to 'press the wrong button.'
Never put them in charge of a nuclear war.
Thanks Paul. When I posted, it wasn't clear from the article that charges were still being considered in some cases; I see that's been amended now.
Posted by: D.G. | June 07, 2009 at 11:00 AM
DG, as I understand it, there are three possible prosecutions from the information supplied by the Telegraph. All the others appear to be within the existing rules of the Green Book and Tax rules. Both are extremely permissive and allow ludicrous claims. But they are not illegal as far as I can see. I am open to correction.
Posted by: Paul Flynn | June 06, 2009 at 05:07 PM
"It is these fantastic qualities that have led you to into a situation that, sad as it is, you had to take action upon"
Indeed, as Operation Valkyrie swings in to action, the brave will do what they can. I just hope Paul gets a cigarette and a blindfold instead of piano wire..
Posted by: Kay Tie | June 06, 2009 at 12:02 AM
"it takes real guts to do as Gordon is doing and take this country through the other side of the recession."
What a bizarre view of the world you have. Gordon isn't going to "take" this country through anything: the millions of people living here will do that by living their lives according to their changing circumstances. Gordon can, at best, tinker around with the gewgaws of Government programmes - he's not Moses leading the people to the Promised Land, no matter how many times you sing Jerusalem at your gatherings.
Posted by: Kay Tie | June 06, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Dear Paul,
This decision can easily be seen as a cheap shot, or attention seeking announcement by yourself, but anyone familiar with your served duties, opinions and results over your career would know that your constituents and then the labour party are at the heart of your passion
It is these fantastic qualities that have led you to into a situation that, sad as it is, you had to take action upon
You’re a rare breed amongst politicians Paul, long may you continue
Posted by: ICantSay | June 05, 2009 at 11:02 PM
Dear Paul
I totally disagree with you and found it appalling that you just feed the Tory media with your remarks on the TV tonight.
You spoke about a new leader being better placed to win an election 'NEXT YEAR.'
You know very well that there would have to be a much earlier general election if we were to change leader again and we would be routed. How does that help the party?
Its easy to go on TV and make cheap shots at the PM, it takes real guts to do as Gordon is doing and take this country through the other side of the recession.
You are dancing to the tune of the Tory media and I am feeling very let down by you.
Posted by: Chris | June 05, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Dear Paul
Your Pal, Ian Gibson has resigned.
I hope he considers standing as an independent.
I am sorry that he didn't get treated fairly but that is the nature of the Labour Party you are a member of.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Posted by: George Laird | June 05, 2009 at 04:20 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8085207.stm
I knew it. Snuck out while everyone's focused on the election results. The fraudulent MPs that make the good ones look bad are going to get away with it.
""It is for the Commons and the Lords authorities to decide whether they wish to consider these cases..."
In other words, it's for MPs (and the people who WORK FOR MPs) to decide whether or not there will be prosecutions. Clearly, laws are for the "little people," not the likes of them.
AS for "The panel's view ... that, unless evidence is available which shows individuals deliberately misled the fees office, it is highly unlikely that there could be a successful prosecution"
From their own definitions on dishonesty:
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/fraud_act/#a18
"The Ghosh (Note: [1982] 1QB 1053) definition applies:
) Was what was done dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people?
) Must the Defendant have realised that what he was doing was, by those standards, dishonest?
***It should be remembered that the question of 'dishonesty' is one for the jury*** and submissions of no case to answer should not be acceded based on the issue of dishonesty."
I am absolutely bloody furious. Again.
Posted by: DG | June 05, 2009 at 03:16 PM
In the event of a nuclear war, we'd all be dead within half hour anyway. lol
:p
I voted Lib Dem today, it was good to actually affect government, instead of rant about it. :)
Posted by: Gareth Williams | June 05, 2009 at 03:08 PM
Congrats Paul, you've made the Guardian...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/jun/05/local-elections-european-elections
Posted by: DG | June 05, 2009 at 10:52 AM
I saw you on the news this morning in your calls for Brown to step down as leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister.
I would just like to be the first to say, thankyou for your bravery in joining the calls for Brown to go. He has been an unmanouvreable, sluggish leader, and I believe Alan Johnson or David Milliband would do a much better job of leading us into the imminent election.
Lets just hope Labour is not split apart in these difficult times. I certainly hope other MP's will do the right thing, and do what is best for not only the party, but for the people, as will Gordon Brown.
Chris
Posted by: Chris Carter | June 05, 2009 at 08:16 AM
So Purnell's jumped, that's no real loss.
He was the sort of Minister that didn't give a toss.
He's filled his pockets and done little more,
Than ensure that the disabled remain dirt poor.
As you're aware, I've got a case,
Against the DWP who deserve shame and disgrace.
So far, over the years, I've dealt with seven,
Secretaries of State, it might as well have been eleven.
Andrew Davies, John Huttton, and David Blunkett,
Darling, Purnell and Hain all flunk it.
They pass my case to any old minion,
And adjudicate on the basis of flawed opinion.
But one considered my case in person,
And therefore I will cast no aspersion,
Against Parliament's answer to Charlie Bronson.
That's right, you've got it, Alan Johnson.
Alan Johnson was the only one,
That saw merit in my case and didn't shun,
Responsibility and made a decision,
To end the DWP's claim of 'over-provision'.
But, unfortunately, like others, he was moved,
Before the finality of my case could be fully proved.
As an officially designated 'miserable old bleeder',
I nominate Alan Johnson as next Labour Leader.
Posted by: Jolly Roger | June 05, 2009 at 12:34 AM
Just what is that shining in the distance,
As expenses remove the last of my resistance?
An oasis of yellow in an over-red sea,
Beacon-like in it's luminosity.
Like a lonely little petunia in an onion patch,
An example that others should seek to match.
So thanks to Paul for saving us money,
In this land bereft of Milk and Honey.
I'm impressed with the Public's exe's suggestions,
Reading them helpfully aids my digestions.
They certainly merit full support,
And must be seen as the last resort,
In redeeming Politicians' diminished cred,
The Public's fed up of being bled.
So, good luck with your presentation,
If you can persuade them, you'll have our admiration.
Posted by: Jolly Roger | June 04, 2009 at 11:56 PM
Good on you Paul for holding your head up and saying in public what a lot of Labour MPs are saying in private. Gordon is now a liability and should stand aside for the sake of the party and the country.
This would give nearly a year for a new PM to regroup and rebuild the party before another election. It would also give time to route out the minority MPs with dodgy expense claims so the electorate can know exactly who they are voting for.
David Cameron's constant bleating about calling an election now only serves his self interest and not the good of Parliament.
Who would you suggest would be a goo replacement for Gordon?
Posted by: Mark W-J | June 04, 2009 at 11:35 PM