« Resign Again – David Davis! | Main | Fiat Lux »

October 13, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8346d963f69e20105357dcb60970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New world born-unseen:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John

The Canadian election is a signpost for the worlds future. Are they going to perpetuate tne Bush clone Harper with his flagrent import of US style policies. Or are we going to see a swing to a more liberal environmentally aware age in Canada that may signal a similair move furthur south in November.
Will the population finally see through the fear generated by exagerating crime and the dangers of drug use. I really do hope so. With almost 18% of Canadians being regular users of cannabis they have their own personal experience of the benign nature of this currently illegal drug (of course it is not risk free) and the comparative lethal affects of alcohol and tobacoo in their society.
I hold Canada as the freeest Country in the world with a vibrant economy that is only held back by the current Conservative Goverment.If I had the skills and age on my side I would have fled this country years ago to live in Canada.
As I write according to the pre election day polls it looks like the greens are going to make substantial gains from last time...fingers crossed.

paulflynn

Thank John. I am certainly no friend of Harper and would love to see his downfall. He appaers to have messed things up in Quebec but gained elsewhere because the Canadian economy is in a better state than the American one.

I hope to be in Canad House at 7.30 tomorrow to see the improved situation - with luck.

valleylad

Apart from Canada, back on message Paul :)

LIBOR pretty much unchanged, no apology for the govt complicity in this mess. No mention that unsustainable personal debt is the root cause It's wait and see if this will work, regardless we're in for a very rough ride. It might be nice to remind people of some of Gordon's mansion house speeches.

My issue with 42 days was it might be used against non-religious people regardless of colour (cf. Iceland?). If it could only be used against the religious I wouldn't see a problem with 90 days or more. The problem is terrorism is defined too broadly.

I never "need to see IPS staff in person", I may be forced to (and pay for the priveledge) shortly. But surely the statement should read this is where we will compel people to attend when it suits us under penalty of law. I'm not a "customer", and have little or no choice in dealing with these pathetic people.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.