No charges-but all guilty
There were no prosecutions arising from Yates of the Yard's probe into cash for peerages. But the Public Administration Committee declares all three major parties guilty.
There is an obvious correlation of party donations and the gift of seats in the House of Lords. The system is rotten. It always has been. Our committee calls for an Anti-corruption Bill.
We want to sever the link between a peerage as an honour or as a job of legislator. The privilege of a seat in the Lords should be on merit alone, until we get around to electing them.
Not that we should wait for a new law to be passed. We should immediately rule out the possibility that individuals can buy a seat in parliament. Tony Blair has made a start. He is the first retiring prime minister not to have a retirement list of ermined cronies.
We also call for a mechanism to expel Lords. One suggested is Lord Laidlaw who agreed as a condition of appointment to live here and pay UK taxes. He did neither. He cannot resign so he is on leave of absence. We have yet to get any clear answer of the status of Tory mega-donor Lord Ashcroft. My friend Gordon Prentice has a private members bill to end this anomaly. With Government support it could make it to the statute book.
Find the Leaker
The impact of our Select Committee reported has been blunted by a talkative leaker.
The Committee Chair, Tony Wright, and all other non-leakers are furious. Two Sunday papers carried stories from the report and some details of what was said in a confidential briefing. This is soul destroying and undermines the confidence we have in one another.
In the past we have discussed issues openly between members of different parties in the certainly that it would not be blabbered to the press. Now someone is running to the papers, we must all go onto the defensive and watch what we say. This is damaging because uninhibited debate produces the best outcomes.
The report was embargoed for midnight tonight. Because of the Sunday leaks the Guardian today ignored the embargo and used the report as their front page lead. This will reduce the coverage on radio and television because tomorrow it will be stale news.
The purpose of embargoes is to give all media an equal chance of being first with the news. Presumably the leaker believes that he/she will get favourable headlines in the papers as a reward. It doesn't need a Sherlock Holmes to identify the culprit. On another committee I served on in the past, a leaker was easily spotted and pressure was mounted to expel him from the committee. Something similar may happen here.
Cameron-gate
You may have to search hard to find the headline Cameron-gate in the Mail or Express. But the Tory Leader's local party has broken the law in exactly the same way as anyone in the over-hyped Donor-gate.
David Cameron's constituency party has admitted receiving more than £7,000 in illegal donations. The benefactors were not British voters.
No sign of any contrition from the Tory Leader who is in China. He might have ensured his own hearth was clean before spraying around the accusations.
Anyone with any faith in the objectivity of the British Press should observe the attention this crime receives. Compare and contrast with the hysteria dished out to Peter Hain. Peter's sin was a venial bookkeeping one. Cameron's was a mortal sin of lawbreaking. Will Cameron call in the police to investigate himself?




























Recent Comments